Home / Alternatives to Multi-Man Apps Like Multi-Man for iPhone and iPad
by Dorus Oerlemans ★ 5.0 6 ratings Health & Fitness $3.99 Data updated 2026-11-05
Ranked alternatives Showing 461–480 of 1,000 ranked alternatives.
Frostskull AB
★ 0.0 0 ratings Health & Fitness Free Data updated 2026-09-06
GERO GOTTSCHALK
★ 0.0 0 ratings Health & Fitness $3.99 Data updated 2026-10-12
Panopticore Inc.
★ 5.0 5 ratings Health & Fitness Free Data updated 2026-09-06
Intellewave Inc
Analyze stress wellness and fitness
The app analyzes heart rate variability through a protocol of laying-to-standing and breathing tests. It assesses physiological status, physical fitness, and current stress and wellness levels.
★ 5.0 5 ratings Health & Fitness Free Data updated 2026-09-26
JACKSON HEALTH AND FITNESS LIMITED
★ 0.0 0 ratings Health & Fitness Free Data updated 2026-09-06
Florian Schweizer
★ 5.0 1 ratings Health & Fitness Free Data updated 2026-09-06
Samantha Roobol
★ 3.0 2 ratings Health & Fitness Free Data updated 2026-09-23
Evocate Media LLC
★ 4.0 5 ratings Health & Fitness Free Data updated 2026-09-06
SharpSoftware AS
★ 0.0 0 ratings Health & Fitness Free Data updated 2026-09-06
希 陈
★ 5.0 3 ratings Health & Fitness Free Data updated 2026-09-06
180 Ministries
★ 5.0 2 ratings Education Free Data updated 2026-09-06
Jeet Dholakia
★ 5.0 4 ratings Health & Fitness Free Data updated 2026-09-06
Senstream, Inc.
★ 4.6 5 ratings Education Free Data updated 2026-09-13
THE PELVIC PHYSIO ONLINE PTY LTD
★ 0.0 0 ratings Health & Fitness Free Data updated 2026-09-06
Henrik Bruntrup
★ 5.0 1 ratings Health & Fitness $0.99 Data updated 2026-09-06
Yoav Sabag
★ 4.4 5 ratings Health & Fitness Free Data updated 2026-09-06
MBRB SP Z O O
★ 4.0 1 ratings Health & Fitness Free Data updated 2026-09-06
AYR BREATHWORK LLC
★ 5.0 2 ratings Health & Fitness Free Data updated 2026-09-06
MyBya, LLC
★ 5.0 5 ratings Health & Fitness Free Data updated 2026-09-06
Satisform
★ 0.0 0 ratings Health & Fitness Free Data updated 2026-09-06
How we rank alternatives Apps are ranked by functional similarity, category fit, rating confidence, and popularity.
Previous Next