Home / Alternatives to Lexacom Apps Like Lexacom for iPhone and iPad
by Aprobrium Ltd ★ 0.0 0 ratings Productivity Free Data updated 2026-09-06
Ranked alternatives Showing 221–240 of 1,000 ranked alternatives.
Skyfire Solar Design, LLC
★ 5.0 2 ratings Utilities Free Data updated 2026-09-06
Ravel Technological Solutions LTD
★ 4.7 35 ratings Medical Free Data updated 2026-09-06
Prodtype LLC
★ 0.0 0 ratings Productivity Free Data updated 2026-09-06
Thinh Truong
★ 0.0 0 ratings Photo & Video Free Data updated 2026-09-06
RockieStar Inc.
★ 5.0 2 ratings Utilities Free Data updated 2026-09-06
BLACKSMITH SIA
★ 4.6 33 ratings Productivity Free Data updated 2026-09-06
TracMap NZ Ltd
★ 5.0 1 ratings Productivity Free Data updated 2026-09-06
FTRBND, LLC
★ 5.0 1 ratings Productivity Free Data updated 2026-09-06
Aliru GmbH
★ 0.0 0 ratings Productivity Free Data updated 2026-09-06
CMoney TECHNOLOGY CO.,LTD
★ 4.5 2 ratings Productivity Free Data updated 2026-09-06
Valerio Lo Giudice
Manage teams, track stats, plan practices
Manage teams with seasonal stats, team photos, and performance data. Export stats, organize players and coaches, plan practices, track game performance, and schedule exercises. Sync with coaching staff for real-time updates.
★ 4.5 59 ratings Sports $4.99 Data updated 2026-10-18
BACKPULLVER SOFTWARE LTD OOD
★ 4.6 17 ratings Music $7.99 Data updated 2026-09-10
Brian Camp
★ 0.0 0 ratings Productivity Free Data updated 2026-09-06
Data Consulting Services
★ 0.0 0 ratings Developer Tools $0.99 Data updated 2026-11-03
Hariharan Balakrishnan
★ 0.0 0 ratings Productivity Free Data updated 2026-09-06
Lemon Fox GmbH
★ 0.0 0 ratings Productivity Free Data updated 2026-09-06
Muhammad Anas Nadeem
★ 5.0 2 ratings Education Free Data updated 2026-09-06
Digital Facilities Management Ltd
★ 0.0 0 ratings Productivity Free Data updated 2026-09-06
Hanna Raita
★ 4.5 6 ratings Productivity Free Data updated 2026-09-06
Stefano Bergamini
★ 0.0 0 ratings Productivity Free Data updated 2026-09-06
How we rank alternatives Apps are ranked by functional similarity, category fit, rating confidence, and popularity.
Previous Next