Home / Alternatives to 吞食天地3:放置版 Apps Like 吞食天地3:放置版 for iPhone and iPad
by 9Splay Entertainment Technology Co., LTD. ★ 2.8 5 ratings Games Free Data updated 2026-10-11
Ranked alternatives Showing 321–340 of 1,000 ranked alternatives.
Art Gorski
★ 4.9 9 ratings Games Free Data updated 2026-09-14
Dan Lespect
★ 5.0 9 ratings Games Free Data updated 2026-09-06
Portly Pig Studios LLC
★ 5.0 9 ratings Games Free Data updated 2026-09-09
Dai-Hyun Kwon
★ 4.9 9 ratings Games Free Data updated 2026-09-22
Maciej Targoni
Control a ball in circles.
The app presents a minimal dodge-em-up game where users control a ball moving around interconnected circles. It features ambient music and a simple, mind-bending gameplay experience.
★ 3.8 9 ratings Games $0.99 Data updated 2026-10-29
DayOne LLC
★ 4.3 9 ratings Games Free Data updated 2026-09-23
GOBLINZ STUDIO
★ 3.3 9 ratings Games $6.99 Data updated 2026-09-06
Roman Davydov
★ 4.1 8 ratings Games Free Data updated 2026-09-06
MAMA MORIN LLC.
★ 4.0 9 ratings Entertainment Free Data updated 2026-09-10
LOYAL TALENT, LDA
★ 1.4 9 ratings Games Free Data updated 2026-09-23
Lost Factory, LLC
★ 5.0 8 ratings Games Free Data updated 2026-09-06
Devloft UG
★ 3.2 8 ratings Games Free Data updated 2026-09-06
Xsa Software S.R.L.
★ 5.0 7 ratings Games Free Data updated 2026-09-18
Le Thi Thanh Binh
★ 3.8 8 ratings Games Free Data updated 2026-09-06
Scott Woodhouse
★ 4.8 8 ratings Games Free Data updated 2026-09-06
Dong Wook Kim
★ 4.4 8 ratings Games Free Data updated 2026-09-15
Beijing Cangshu Technology Co., Ltd.
★ 4.2 8 ratings Games Free Data updated 2026-09-06
Umbrella Games LLC
★ 5.0 8 ratings Games Free Data updated 2026-09-17
Sly Trunk
A fun educational puzzle game
The app presents a puzzle game with over 100 free levels. It offers a visual adventure with puzzles made from shapes of various colors and sizes, crafted for gamers of all ages.
★ 4.9 7 ratings Games Free Data updated 2026-10-18
daisuke uehara
★ 3.9 8 ratings Games Free Data updated 2026-09-11
How we rank alternatives Apps are ranked by functional similarity, category fit, rating confidence, and popularity.
Previous Next